Heraclius modtog brev fra Profeten (fvmh)

 Tidligere havde jeg et indlæg; Profeten Muhammed (fvmh) , hvor verdenskendte ikke-muslimer har anerkendt profetens fvmh barmhjertighed, sandfærdighed og godhed - og her endnu en historie og denne gang profetens fvmh brev til kejser Heraclius.

 FOTO MID

letters.jpg

Profetens brev til Heraclius;

In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful. This letter is from Muhammad, the Servant of Allah and His Messenger to Heraclius the ruler of Byzantines. Peace be upon him who follows the right path. I invite you with the call of Islam. Accept Islam and you will find peace. Allah will double your reward. But if you turn away then you will have upon you the sin of Arisiyyin (his  subjects). ( O People of the Book! come to common terms as between us and you: That we worship none but Allah; that we associate no partners with him; that we erect not, from among ourselves, Lords and patrons other than Allah.” If then they turn back, say ye: “Bear witness that we (at least) are Muslims (bowing to Allah’s Will). ) (Aal `Imran 3: 64)”
Abu Sufian said [to Ibn `Abbas], “When Heraclius finished his speech and read the letter, there arose commotion and many voices in the court, so we were asked to leave.” (Reported by al-Bukhari)

En mulig konklusion:

It is possible that Heraclius accepted Islam secretly, but he was unable to declare it because he feared rebellion of his people.

Guds sendebuds store, men også svære opgave var, at sprede islam til alle verdenshjørner – og efter at Guds sendebud kom med Guds endegyldige og sande budskab om den sande tro, ville mennesket ikke have undskyldninger for ikke, at have fulgt sandhedens vej.

Da profeten fvmh blev erklæret som Guds sendebud af Gud, begyndte profetens fvmh virke som profet, som begyndte at forkynde Islam - og det er her, hvor Heraclius kommer ind i billedet, hvor han også får kendskab til profeten fvmh igennem det overnnævnte brev, som Profeten sender til ham.  

Abu Sufyan var en ikke-muslim der levede under profetens tid, og før han omvendte sig til islam, var han profetens fvmh ærkefjende, men før han blev muslim, fik han æren for, at bevidne over for Kejseren Heraclius, at profeten var af den ædleste slægt på jorden.

 Heraclius modtog det ovennævnte brev af profeten, som inviterede ham til islam. Heraclius efter at have læst brevet bad sit folk om, at få fat på en af profetens folk, og det blev Abu Sufyan, der over for Herkules besvarede kejserens spørgsmål, som vedrørte Profeten fvmh.  Heraclius konkluderede, at Muhammed fvmh var en profet sendt af Gud for, at forkynde Guds budskab.

The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) sent many letters to the neighboring chiefs and rulers inviting them to Islam. He sent Dihyah al-Kalbi (may Allah be pleased with him) with a letter addressed to the Eastern Roman Emperor Heraclius. He ruled a vast territory of the Middle East at that time.

This letter was probably sent to him in the year 628 C.E. Heraclius was in Jerusalem at that time celebrating his victory over the Persians. The letter was given to the governor of Busra, who delivered it to the Emperor. The Emperor was intrigued by this noble letter. He wanted to know more about the one who sent him this letter and whether he was trulyAllah’s Messenger.

There was a caravan of Arab traders in the city. Heraclius ordered the caravan people to be brought to his court. Abu Sufian ibn Harb was the chief of this caravan. He was not a Muslim at that time. Actually, he was then one of the enemies of Islam. Later when he became Muslim he reported this whole incident to `Abdullah ibn `Abbas (may Allah be pleased with both of them).

Ibn `Abbas (may Allah be pleased with him) said: Abu Sufian ibn Harb informed me that Heraclius sent a messenger to him while he was accompanying a caravan from the Quraish. They were merchants doing business in the Levant (Syria, Palestine, Lebanon and Jordan), at the time when Allah’s Messenger had a truce with Abu Sufian and the unbelievers of the Quraish. So Abu Sufian and his companions went to Heraclius at Ilya’ (Jerusalem). Heraclius called them in the court and he had all the senior Roman dignitaries around him.

He called for his translator who, translating Heraclius’ question, said to them, “Who amongst you is closely related to that man who claims to be a Prophet?”
Abu Sufian replied, “I am the nearest relative to him (among the group).”
Heraclius said, “Bring him close to me and make his companions stand behind him.”

Abu Sufian added [to Ibn `Abbas], “Heraclius told his translator to tell my companions that he wanted to put some questions to me regarding that man (the Prophet) and that if I told a lie they (my companions) should contradict me. By Allah, had I not been afraid of my companions labeling me a liar, I would have lied against him (the Prophet).”

[The dialogue then continued like this.]
Heraclius: What is his family status among you?
Abu Sufian: He belongs to a noble family among us.
H.: Has anyone else among you before him ever claimed the same (i.e., to be a Prophet)?
A.S.: No.
H.: Was anyone among his ancestors a king?
A.S.: No.
H.: Are the strong and powerful following him or the weak and poor?
A.S.: It is the weak and poor that are following him.
H.: Are his followers increasing or decreasing (day by day)?
A.S.: They are increasing.
H.: Does anyone among those who embrace his religion become displeased and leave the religion afterwards?
A.S.: No.
H.: Have you ever accused him of telling lies before his claim (to be a Prophet)?
A.S.: No.
H.: Does he ever betray or is he treacherous in his agreements?
A.S.: No, we are at truce with him but we do not know what he will do in it. (Abu Sufian said [to Ibn `Abbas], “I could not find an

opportunity to say anything against him except that word.”)
H.: Have you ever had a fight with him?
A.S.: Yes.
H.: What was the outcome of your battles with him?
A.S.: The fighting between him and us was undecided and victory was shared between him and us by turns.
H.: What does he order you to do?
A.S.: He tells us to worship Allah alone and not to worship anything along with Him, and to renounce all that our ancestors had said.

He orders us to pray, to speak the truth, to be chaste and to keep good relations with our kith and kin.
Heraclius said to his translator to convey to him,
[1.] I asked you about his family and your reply was that he belongs to a noble family among you. In fact, all the Messengers come

from noble families among their respective peoples.
[2.] I questioned you whether anyone else among you claimed such a thing, and your reply was no. If you had said yes, I would have

thought that this person is copying the previous person’s saying.
[3.] I asked you whether anyone of his ancestors was a king. Your reply was no. If you had said yes, I would have thought that the

man wants to take back his ancestral kingdom.
[4.] I further asked you whether he was ever accused of telling lies before he said what he said, and your reply was no. So I wonder

how a person who does not tell a lie about others could ever tell a lie about Allah.
[5.] I then asked you whether the rich people follow him or the poor. You replied that it was the poor who followed him. In fact, the

poor are always the followers of the Messengers.
[6.] I asked you whether his followers are increasing or decreasing. You replied that they were increasing. In fact, this is the way of

true faith, till it is complete in all respects.
[7.] I asked you whether there was anyone who, after accepting his religion, became displeased with and abandoned his religion.

Your reply was no. In fact, this is the sign of true faith, when its delight penetrates the depths of the hearts.
[8.] I asked you whether he had ever betrayed and your reply was no. Likewise, the Messengers never betray.
[9.] I asked you what he ordered you to do, and your reply was he ordered you to worship Allah, and not to worship anything along with Him and forbade you to worship idols and ordered you to pray, to speak the truth and to be chaste. If what you have said is true, he will very soon occupy this place underneath my feet now. I knew from the scriptures that he was going to come but I did not know that he would be from you. If I could reach him I would go immediately to meet him and if I were with him, I would certainlywash his feet.
Heraclius then asked for the letter addressed by Allah’s Messenger to him. The letter was delivered by Dihya to the governor ofBusra, who forwarded it to Heraclius. The letter said: “In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful. This letter is from Muhammad, the Servant of Allah and His Messenger to Heraclius the ruler of Byzantines. Peace be upon him who follows the right path. I invite you with the call of Islam. Accept Islam and you will find peace. Allah will double your reward. But if you turn away then you will have upon you the sin of Arisiyyin (his subjects). ( O People of the Book! come to common terms as between us and you: That we worship none but Allah; that we associate no partners with him; that we erect not, from among ourselves, Lords and patrons other than Allah.” If then they turn back, say ye: “Bear witness that we (at least) are Muslims (bowing to Allah’s Will). ) (Aal `Imran 3: 64)” Abu Sufian said [to Ibn `Abbas], “When Heraclius finished his speech and read the letter, there arose commotion and many voices in the court, so we were asked to leave.” (Reported by al-Bukhari)
It is possible that Heraclius accepted Islam secretly, but he was unable to declare it because he feared rebellion of his people. (Islamonline)

8 Responses to “Heraclius modtog brev fra Profeten (fvmh)”

  1. Gülay

    Det var bedre men jeg kan også godt tage fejl, men ellers spændende indlæg selvom jeg er i tvivl om hvorvidt han skulle have konverteret til islam.

    Ellers er det nogle af de her aspekter og nuanceringer som vi ikke har i danske historirebøger.

  2. VRØVL og spar mig for det i historiebøgerne!!

  3. Anonym

    Tror ikke lige, du argumenterer særlig godt med dit udbrød; VRØVL

  4. Det er ren spekulation, at han skulle være konverteret i hemmelighed. Men med udgangspunkt i hans forsøg på at samle de to store kristne trosretninger, kunne det meget vel tænkes, at han generelt var åben for andre potentielt kristne trosretninger.

  5. Det er ikke spekulation men han havde konverteret til islam .

  6. Gülay Kocbay Jeg er glad for at du ikke er blevet helt gak gak.

    Men faktisk sytes jeg at den første udgave var sjovere.

    Det at Du sletter posts og indlæg, frem for at lade dem stå og forklare dig selv, vil i det lange løb skade din blogs kvalitets, eler ihvertfald kommentarenes kvalitet.

    Det er ikke særligt fristende for kommentatorer at skrive et længre veligennemtænkt indlæg, når det muligvis bliver slettet med det samme.

    Man for en langt bedre debat og kvalitet ved at lade tingende blive stående og så tage den derfra. Hvis man så skriver noget forkert, så kan man gøre opmærksom på det, uden at slette det “forkerte”.

  7. Phanaratt - ja du har nok ret, det tænkte jeg sleet ik på.

    Og jov, dit forslag er nok bedre.. Hmm.. nu er jeg ikke en erfaren blogger, så med jeress gåde rpd, kommer det nok ;)og det vil jeg huske til næste gang.

  8. Heh. Hvis Heraclius var ih og åh så muslimsk hvorfor gjorde han så sit bedste for at kaste de invaderende muslimske hære ud af det østromerske rige i slaget ved Yarmuk i 636 efter de muslimske arabere invaderede i år 634?

    Hvad Heraclius påståede rolle som “religionssamler” angår, er det vel værd at bemærke at den religiøse strid i østromerriget stod imellem en ortodox majoritet af kristne og flere mindre krsitne randsekter (monofysitter, monoenergister etc.). Islam var givetvis for ukendt og ubetydelig i denne sammenhæng (og på dette tidspunkt) til at have nogen egentlig appel.

    Derudover er der selvfølgelig selve kildens karakter som værende skrevet “ex post facto” på et tidspunkt hvor islam havde sat sig fast i østromerriget af en konvertit der givetvis har haft sin egen kage at mele.

    Kyrie eleison, Christe eleison ;-)

Leave a Reply